NRCM news release
Click on image above to download full report.
Augusta, Maine – The Trump Administration has proposed deep cuts to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) programs that reduce pollution in Maine, save the lives of Maine people, and strengthen our communities and economy. According to a comprehensive new report by the Natural Resources Council of Maine, the Administration’s unprecedented proposed cuts to EPA would cause widespread harm to efforts to protect clean air and clean water, achieve economic redevelopment at shuttered paper mills, and protect Maine people from toxic hazards.
“These cuts would cause serious harm nationwide and would be particularly damaging for states like Maine where our environment and economy are tightly intertwined,” says NRCM Advocacy Director Pete Didisheim.
The Trump Administration’s Fiscal Year 2018 Budget singles out EPA for the deepest cuts of any federal agency, cutting its budget by $2.6 billion (31%) and its staff by 3,200 (21%), and completely eliminating more than 50 EPA programs. The proposed EPA budget, adjusted for inflation, would be cut to levels not seen since the 1970s. These radical cuts would be unprecedented in the 47-year history of the agency, and cause crippling reductions to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), which depends heavily on EPA funding. DEP received $11.4 million in funding from EPA last year, which paid for nearly 100 staff.
NRCM’s report documents how the proposed EPA budget cuts would damage virtually all aspects of environmental protection in Maine, and would be especially harmful in the following areas:
- Putting Maine’s Clean Water at Risk The budget proposes deep cuts in EPA funding that is vital for the protection of Maine’s rivers, lakes, streams, and coastal waters. Of particular concern, the budget calls for elimination of the Non-Point Source (NPS) pollution program, which protects lakes from polluted runoff. Maine lakes provide $3.5 billion to Maine’s economy annually and support 52,000 jobs.
- Increasing Air Pollution and Health Threats The proposal cuts funding by 30% for programs that help DEP protect Maine people from dangerous air pollution. Because Maine has some of the highest asthma rates in the country, increased air pollution would result in more emergency room visits, hospitalization, and premature deaths.
- Making Maine Homes Less Safe The EPA budget would eliminate programs that address radon pollution (a leading cause of cancer), and that reduce risks to children from lead-based paint. Elimination of EPA’s lead program would put more Maine children at risk of learning disabilities, lower IQ, speech delay, hyperactivity, aggressive behavior, and other problems caused by lead poisoning.
- Slowing Redevelopment of Brownfield and Waste Sites The EPA Brownfield Program would face deep cuts, impeding the ability of Maine communities to secure economic redevelopment of contaminated sites, such as closed paper mills. Cuts in the Superfund program threaten to slow down the cleanup of the former Callahan mine in Brooksville, and could complicate the cleanup at Lincoln Pulp and Tissue Mill in Lincoln, which is being considered for Superfund designation.
- Increasing Risks to Drinking Water The budget eliminates funding for the Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) program. These funds help DEP protect groundwater, drinking water, and human health by ensuring that underground petroleum storage is done responsibly. Cuts to this program will lead to more leaks from tanks, and increased contamination of drinking water.
- Terminating Maine Healthy Beach Program The Trump Budget Blueprint eliminates funding for beach water quality testing. Eliminating this program puts Maine residents and visitors at risk. Maine beaches receive an estimated 12 million visitors each year, and these visitors contribute more than $1.6 billion annually to Maine’s economy.
- Stopping Efforts to Address Climate Change The budget eliminates most EPA climate initiatives, including funding for the Clean Power Plan, international climate programs, and climate research. Maine faces serious risks from climate change. Eliminating climate research will reduce the ability of Maine people to understand and prepare for changes already underway that affect property, businesses, and Maine’s economy.
- Halting Important Scientific Research EPA research would be cut by nearly 50%, which would cripple its ability to provide the facts and analysis that policymakers, including Maine lawmakers, need to make sound policy decisions about health and environmental protection. These cuts would delay assessments needed to clean up hazardous waste sites, reduce EPA’s ability to learn how people are affected by a broad range of pollutants, and disrupt efforts to understand the health and environmental impacts of thousands of chemicals currently in the marketplace or under development.
NRCM’s report, Damaging Maine: The Impacts of Proposed Cuts to the EPA Budget, concludes:
“If these budget cuts are enacted, DEP will be forced to terminate critical staff across all program areas. But the real consequences will take place across the Maine landscape. Maine’s lakes and other surface waters will be more polluted; communities with brownfield and Superfund sites, including paper mill towns, may never see those sites cleaned up; Maine people will get sick from air and water pollution; and businesses that depend on clean air and water, and on our current climate, will face growing challenges and possible closures.
The impact of these cuts would extend far beyond the DEP and its work. EPA funding to Maine serves as a catalyst that supports countless efforts by towns, nonprofit organizations, businesses, colleges, and citizens who participate in collective efforts to protect Maine’s precious environmental resources. The EPA budget cuts would reverberate across Maine by putting existing partnerships, cooperative agreements, matching funds, and informal collaborations in jeopardy.
If the intent of the Administration is to dismantle efforts to protect the environment, then this budget represents an unprecedented and radically irresponsible step toward achieving that goal. It would move Maine backward many decades in our efforts to protect the environment, causing harm that would last generations.”
Today’s news conference included Mainers who shared their concerns about the EPA cuts:
Samantha Paradis, RN; Staff Nurse and Nurse Educator at Waldo County General Hospital; Adjunct Community Health Nursing Faculty, Husson University “Maine has one of the highest rates of asthma in the country. What may be good for a polluting power plant in Oklahoma is certainly not good for Maine. Trump’s proposed budget is a recipe for more air pollution in Maine, which hurts our health. Increased air pollution leads to more emergency room visits, hospitalization, and premature deaths for those with asthma, other respiratory illnesses, and our seniors. As the tailpipe of the nation, Maine people need a strong EPA to curb pollution from upwind, polluting states.”
David Van Wie, Adjunct Lecturer, University of New England; Former Director, Maine DEP Bureau of Land & Water Quality; Former State Representative (D-New Gloucester) “The proposed EPA cuts would hit the Maine DEP like a wrecking ball, damaging programs and forcing layoffs that would have significant statewide impacts. Protecting the environment doesn’t just happen. It comes about through the work of career professionals like we have at DEP, working with businesses, communities, organizations, and Maine people. These cuts would shatter many of those relationships. That may be the objective in Washington, DC, but it would be bad in Maine.”
Christine Crocker, Executive Director of Maine Indoor Air Quality Council “EPA funding to Maine plays a critical role in helping to make our buildings safer. Indoor air pollutants—including radon—pose significant public health threats. One in three Maine homes has radon at levels above the recommended action limits. Radon is the #1 cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers, and the second leading cause of lung cancer among the general population. Because people now spend 90% of their time indoors, reducing radon is an important priority. Thanks to EPA support, Maine’s Radon Program helps thousands of homeowners and building managers learn how best to address the risks from radon. If funding was eliminated as proposed, this program to help Mainers avoid the risk of lung cancer from radon would cease and our buildings where Maine citizens live, work, play, and learn would be less safe.”
Lidie Robbins, Executive Director, 30 Mile River Watershed Association “We are extremely concerned about possible cuts to EPA programs that help protect Maine’s lakes. It’s important to keep in mind that our lakes are among Maine’s most valuable natural resources. But our lakes are facing significant threats from polluted runoff, development pressures, and climate change. If these EPA cuts are accepted, then our ability to protect Maine lakes would be much more difficult. We certainly hope that Congress provides EPA with the funding that we need here in Maine, and across the nation, to protect our waters.”
Richard Nelson, lobster fisherman, Friendship, Maine; Member of Maine’s Ocean Acidification Commission “Maine’s lobster industry has a long-established heritage of conservation and has made a series of choices that have helped create a fishery that is flourishing while others are not. Our good management decisions of the past could well be an example to our current Administration, who seems to prefer erring on the side of environmental disaster rather than protection. Not only do these issues affect fishermen as businessmen by threatening our livelihood, but serve to kick-in that heritage of conservation within us. We must now reach out beyond our industry to the decision-makers at state and federal levels to help bring about the policies that will enable us to maintain a healthy ocean and the resources we depend upon.”
